ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2026
When Being Social Is Costly: Empathy's Role for Risk States, Acute Symptoms, and Cumulative Disease Severity of Depression.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When Being Social Is Costly: Empathy's Role for Risk States, Acute Symptoms, and Cumulative Disease Severity of Depression.Journal of clinical psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) frequently report burdensome interpersonal difficulties and altered empathy and perspective-taking. Previous findings on binary comparisons between patients and healthy controls are limited in their clinical translation as they neglect dissociable risk and disease states. In this preregistered study (https://osf.io/k6mdh/overview?view_only=04b7f39f59a8434292cd472120f661ca), we extend case-control comparisons by additionally investigating empathic distress, empathic concern, and perspective-taking in association with (a) familial MDD risk, (b) acute symptom severity, and (c) cumulative MDD severity.
methodWe analyzed data from n = 499 MDD patients and n = 670 healthy controls from the Marburg-Münster-Affective-Cohort Study. Robust linear regressions were run to investigate group differences in self-reported empathy and perspective-taking and their associations with acute symptom severity and familial MDD risk. Analyses on cumulative MDD severity were run in a structural equation model.
resultsEmpathic distress was positively associated with both acute and cumulative MDD severity and was elevated in patients compared to healthy controls. A positive association between empathic distress and familial MDD risk became non-significant after adjustment for age and sex. Patients also reported higher levels of empathic concern-likely influenced by acute symptom severity-and slightly lower levels of perspective-taking.
conclusionsOur associational findings indicate empathic distress to constitute a correlate of acute MDD and longer-term MDD progression, while its relevance for MDD risk requires further investigation. We provide new indications of a generalized heightened emotional attunement during acute depression, entailing both empathic concern and empathic distress. Longitudinal studies are warranted to probe causal associations to prospectively inform psychotherapeutic interventions addressing maladaptive empathic processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.