Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518150›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound2026

Intestinal intussusception with a tadpole-shaped low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm as the leading point: a case report.

Shingo Shioya, Koichiro Shigeta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shingo ShioyaDepartment of Ultrasound, Kirishima Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan. shioya.530@hotmail.co.jp.
Koichiro ShigetaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kirishima Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A tadpole-shaped appendix has been described as a characteristic morphology of appendiceal mucinous lesions, but its clinical and ultrasonographic significance has not been fully clarified. We report a case of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) in which a tadpole-shaped appendiceal lesion acted as the leading point of extensive intestinal intussusception. A woman in her 60s presented with abdominal pain and difficulty with defecation. Abdominal ultrasonography demonstrated extensive intestinal intussusception extending to the transverse colon. At the leading point, the long-axis view showed a tadpole-shaped configuration composed of a spherical cystic dilated portion and a contiguous tubular structure. Dynamic observation suggested that these findings represented a single continuous appendiceal structure rather than separate cystic lesions. The short-axis view of the same structure showed a multilayered concentric ring appearance. Surgical and histopathologic examination established the diagnosis of appendiceal intussusception associated with LAMN, with secondary intestinal intussusception. Although prior or serial imaging was not available to directly demonstrate temporal progression from appendiceal to intestinal intussusception, previous reports have described appendiceal mucinous lesions with tadpole-shaped or cup-and-ball morphology as the leading point of intussusception. Therefore, when this morphology is identified on ultrasonography, careful assessment for appendiceal or intestinal intussusception is warranted. Recognition of this morphology and its continuity on ultrasonography may serve as a practical diagnostic clue and contribute to preoperative diagnosis and appropriate surgical management.

Indexed as

Appendiceal intussusceptionIntestinal intussusceptionLAMNLow-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasmTadpole-shaped appendixUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.