ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026
Data-Driven and State-Tailored Strategies to Promote Suicide Prevention in Corrections Facilities.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introduction to the Special Issue on Transforming Prevention Science: Advances and Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Related Methods.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicide remains a significant public health issue in corrections settings in the United States, requiring systems-focused strategies for prevention and policy. We aggregated across 37 suicide rates, structural, social, and corrections-related variables from publicly available data sources. We used Latent Profile Analysis to identify clusters by profiles of correction systems across 50 states. We analyzed descriptive statistics of state characteristics by cluster to better understand their profiles. Lastly, we conducted ANOVAs to examine differences in suicide rates between clusters. We identified four clusters of states based on their profiles of corrections variables: number of facilities, populations in prisons, jails, and private prisons, prison overcrowding, prisoner-to-staff ratios, and disparities by race/ethnicity and gender. Thirteen states showed the highest racial and gender disparities in prison populations. Twenty-eight states showed average scores across all variables. Four states showed the highest proportion of people incarcerated in privately owned facilities. Five states showed the highest incarceration rates in both prisons and jails. Significant differences in suicide rates were observed across clusters, especially within jails. Findings from this study enhance our understanding of how structural and social factors may be associated with suicide in corrections settings. The discussion includes specific, tailored prevention strategies and policy solutions aimed at systems-level intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42518125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.