ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Cross-fostering with up to two surplus piglets relative to sow functional teats: effects on performance and preweaning survival.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In modern sows, litter size often exceeds the number of functional teats. Therefore, many farms retain surplus piglets within the litter. The present study evaluated the effect of cross-fostering biological litters with up to two surplus piglets relative to functional teats, allowing piglet replacement until day three of lactation. Females were selected (n = 201) at farrowing and evenly distributed among treatments: +0 (number of piglets equal to functional teats), + 1 (one surplus piglet), and + 2 (two surplus piglets). Biological litters were formed three to 12 h after farrowing (day 0). Piglets that died or were removed (low viability) during the first three days of life were weighed and replaced. Piglets in the + 2 group tended to have lower immunocrit values than those in the + 0 group (P = 0.06). Although the + 2 group exhibited the highest overall piglet loss rate across lactation (P ≤ 0.01), litter sizes in the + 1 and + 2 groups were larger than those in the + 0 group (P < 0.01). Piglets in the + 2 group also had reduced average daily gain compared with piglets in the + 0 and + 1 groups (P < 0.01). Facial and joint injuries were more frequent in the + 1 and + 2 groups on D5 (P < 0.01). No differences among treatments were found in udder injury scores, number of functional teats, sow body condition at weaning, daily milk production, or subsequent reproductive performance (P ≥ 0.10). Cross-fostering litters with up to two surplus piglets increased the number of piglets weaned without impairing sow performance, although individual piglet growth and early lesions were negatively affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.