ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
The impact of condylar fracture management on facial soft tissue changes and TMJ function: a 3D CBCT evaluation of open vs. closed reduction.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe influence of condylar fracture treatment on facial symmetry and its relationship with mandibular parameters remains relatively unexplored. Understanding the effects of different treatment modalities on skeletal remodeling and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function is important for improving clinical outcomes. In this study, facial soft tissue-related linear measurements derived from CBCT were evaluated in relation to underlying skeletal changes and TMJ functional outcomes following different management approaches for condylar fractures.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 60 patients with condylar fractures who underwent plate fixation, screw fixation, or closed reduction. Cone-beam computed tomography was used to assess craniofacial measurements and soft-tissue changes at three-time intervals. Mandibular parameters, facial symmetry indices, and TMJ dysfunction scores were analyzed and compared among the treatment groups.
resultsTreatment modality and follow-up time significantly affected skeletal and soft-tissue outcomes. At 6 months, the tragion-pogonion (T-Pog) distance was 136.64 ± 6.10 mm in the plate group, with mean reductions of 3.58 mm, 4.82 mm, and 4.54 mm in the plate, screw, and closed reduction groups, respectively. The closed reduction group exhibited significantly higher TMJ dysfunction scores. Ramus length was positively correlated with T-Pog distance, whereas mediolateral condylar inclination was negatively associated with facial measurements.
conclusionCondylar fractures Management significantly influences mandibular dimensions and facial symmetry, particularly following closed reduction. Surgical fixation methods provide greater skeletal stability and improved functional outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Treatment modality plays a key role in facial symmetry and TMJ function, with surgical fixation resulting in better outcomes. Optimal results may depend on precise anatomical reduction supported by advanced surgical techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42518009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.