Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517998›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Handwritten signatures in neurological and psychiatric disorders: a systematic review with clinical and forensic implications.

Sara Vitale, Giacomo Guidali, Stefano Zago, Nadia Bolognini

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara VitaleDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8695-7910
Giacomo GuidaliDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milan, Italy. giacomo.guidali@unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3741-0404
Stefano ZagoNeurology Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Hospital Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6578-4385
Nadia BologniniDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milan, Italy. nadia.bolognini@unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-8658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignature production represents a complex motor and cognitive behavior, highly automatized and repeated countless times throughout life. It ranks among the most durable graphic forms, often preserved even when writing processes are impaired. Studies examining signature characteristics in clinical cohorts are limited. The available evidence raises questions about its potential as a behavioral marker of neurological and psychiatric disorders.

methodsWe conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review up to 4th December 2025 to summarize evidence on how neurological and psychiatric conditions may affect signature features. Eligible articles on this topic were searched in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases. Sixteen papers were included, and their results were systematically described and qualitatively analyzed.

resultsThe available literature suggests that signature production appears relatively independent of global cognitive decline, although it is sensitive to specific pathological conditions (e.g., micrographia in Parkinson's disease, increased tortuosity in cerebral small vessel disease, and alterations observed in mania, delirium, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and major depressive disorder). Alterations commonly affect kinematic parameters, as well as visuospatial and constructional features. However, no disorder-specific signature pattern emerges from current evidence, largely due to the methodological heterogeneity across studies.

conclusionsThe handwritten signature holds promise as a behavioral marker of brain disorders, serving as a potentially useful, complementary - rather than a stand-alone - indicator of neurological and psychiatric conditions, which could be potentially useful in clinical settings. The implications for forensic applications remain largely theoretical and have not yet been standardized.

Indexed as

HandwritingMental DisordersNervous System DiseasesHumansDementiaHandwritingNeurologicalPsychiatricSignature

Identifiers

PMID42517998
PMCPMC13415343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.