ReviewMolecular neurobiology2026
Candidate Biomarkers of Bipolar Disorder Progression: Implications for Ketamine and Psychedelic Interventions.
Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bipolar depression is the main driver of disability, suicidality, and treatment resistance in bipolar disorder (BD). The neuroprogression hypothesis proposes that repeated mood episodes and related biological disturbances contribute to worsening outcomes over time. Ketamine and psychedelic interventions have emerged as rapid-acting treatments that engage pathways potentially relevant to these processes. This narrative, hypothesis-generating review synthesized evidence on biomarkers of illness progression in BD together with emerging data on ketamine and psychedelic-assisted interventions. A structured but non-systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in December 2025 and February 2026, prioritizing human BD studies, especially longitudinal and staging-based designs, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and mechanistically relevant preclinical and early-phase clinical studies. Across studies, more advanced BD was associated with abnormalities in inflammatory signaling, neurotrophic regulation, structural and functional neuroimaging, and epigenetic processes. However, findings were heterogeneous, often modest in effect size, and frequently based on cross-sectional designs. Many candidate biomarkers appeared more closely related to current mood state than to cumulative illness progression. Peripheral BDNF and inflammatory markers showed limited specificity, functional neuroimaging findings were largely state-dependent, and epigenetic alterations were focal and context-sensitive rather than uniform. Ketamine and psychedelic compounds modulated several of these same pathways in preclinical models and, to a lesser extent, in human studies, although most mechanistic clinical evidence was derived from unipolar treatment-resistant depression rather than BD. Preliminary bipolar-specific studies, mainly in bipolar II depression, suggest possible feasibility and antidepressant effects of psilocybin- and 5-MeO-DMT-derived interventions under carefully controlled conditions. Current evidence supports dynamic multisystem biological abnormalities in BD but does not yet establish a reliable biomarker framework for staging or neuroprogression. Ketamine and psychedelic interventions are mechanistically relevant, but evidence for true disease modification or clinical downstaging in BD remains indirect. Longitudinal, multimodal, within-subject studies are needed to distinguish state-related changes from cumulative progression and to link biomarker change with meaningful clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42517990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.