ReviewTropical animal health and production2026
Bluetongue virus in Middle Eastern ruminants: vector evidence, surveillance gaps, and research priorities.
Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bluetongue virus (BTV) is an economically important arbovirus of domestic and wild ruminants transmitted primarily by Culicoides biting midges. The Middle East represents a key ecological corridor linking African, Asian, and European transmission systems, yet entomovirological evidence of BTV infection in regional Culicoides populations remains fragmented. This narrative review synthesizes available literature on Culicoides species distribution and published evidence of BTV detection in field-collected midges across Middle Eastern countries. Major bibliographic databases were searched to identify entomological surveys, entomovirological investigations, and ecological studies relevant to BTV transmission in livestock-associated settings. Published data indicate that several proven or suspected vector species, including Culicoides imicola, members of the Obsoletus and Pulicaris groups, and other candidate vectors, are widely distributed across the region. However, although serological and clinical evidence confirms BTV circulation in ruminant populations in multiple countries, direct detection of BTV in Culicoides has been reported only in a limited number of settings. Most countries rely primarily on animal-based surveillance, with limited integration of systematic vector monitoring. Methodological heterogeneity, short-term sampling, and restricted use of sensitive molecular diagnostics likely contribute to under-detection of infected midges. Strengthening bluetongue preparedness in the Middle East requires coordinated, longitudinal Culicoides surveillance combined with standardized molecular screening, improved taxonomic resolution, and integration of vector and host data to better define transmission dynamics and support evidence-based control strategies in livestock production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42517987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.