Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517977›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2026

Disparities in colonoscopy adherence and neoplasia detection after positive fecal immunochemical test: a retrospective matched cohort study.

Stephanie Chaparro, Mostafa Eysha, Islam Hamza Zaki, Mona A Ali, Hend A Elsaka, Alejandro Robles, Marc J Zuckerman, Sherif E Elhanafi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie Chaparro *Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, El Paso, Texas, USA. stephanie.a.chaparro@gmail.com.
Mostafa Eysha *Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA.
Islam Hamza ZakiDepartment of Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, D.C., USA.
Mona A AliFaculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Hend A ElsakaFaculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Alejandro RoblesDivision of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA.
Marc J ZuckermanDivision of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA.
Sherif E ElhanafiDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Texas at Tyler School of Medicine, Tyler, Texas, USA. sherif.elhanafi@uttyler.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is widely used as a first-line, noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tool due to its convenience, affordability, and high patient adherence. However, its effectiveness depends on timely follow-up colonoscopy, and failure to complete diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive FIT can result in missed or delayed detection of precancerous lesions or CRC. It remains unclear whether FIT-based screening and subsequent follow-up are equally effective across age groups and racial and ethnic populations. This study evaluates real-world differences in colonoscopy adherence and diagnostic yield following a positive FIT and examines their implications for disparities in CRC outcomes and all-cause mortality.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using de-identified patient data from the TriNetX research network. Adult patients aged ≥ 45 years who underwent colorectal cancer screening were identified using ICD-10 codes, and positive FIT results were identified using LOINC code 29,771-3. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on whether they had a diagnostic colonoscopy performed within 1 year of the positive FIT. The study population was further stratified into three age-based cohorts (45-50, 51-64, and 65-85 years), two ethnicity-based cohorts (Hispanic and non-Hispanic), and five race-based cohorts (White, Black, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and American Indian or Alaska Native). To reduce selection bias and account for potential confounders, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using demographic characteristics and relevant comorbidities. Matched cohorts were compared using odds ratios (ORs) for colonoscopy adherence, polyp detection, and colorectal cancer detection at both the 1-year and 10-year follow-up intervals. All-cause mortality was compared between matched cohorts using hazard ratios (HRs) at the same 1-year and 10-year follow-up intervals.

resultsThe study included 45,598 adults with a positive FIT, of whom 17,727 completed colonoscopy within 1 year and 27,871 did not. After propensity score matching, 17,101 patients remained in each group. Patients who completed colonoscopy had higher CRC detection at 1 year (OR 2.401, 95% CI 1.771-3.257) and 10 years (OR 1.501, 95% CI 1.189-1.895), as well as higher polyp detection at 1 year (OR 17.610, 95% CI 16.534-18.756) and 10 years (OR 14.331, 95% CI 13.577-15.126). Colonoscopy completion was associated with lower all-cause mortality at 1 year (HR 0.604, 95% CI 0.516-0.707) and 10 years (HR 0.799, 95% CI 0.744-0.859). Adults aged 45-50 had higher colonoscopy adherence than those aged 51-64 (OR 1.214, 95% CI 1.111-1.326), while adults aged 51-64 had higher adherence than those aged 65-85 (OR 1.248, 95% CI 1.195-1.304). Hispanic patients demonstrated higher adherence than non-Hispanic patients (OR 1.686, 95% CI 1.537-1.848). Polyp detection was higher among Hispanic versus non-Hispanic patients (OR 1.165, 95% CI 1.059-1.282) and White versus Black patients (OR 1.111, 95% CI 1.026-1.202). No significant differences in CRC detection were observed across age, race, or ethnicity subgroups.

conclusionIn this large real-world cohort study, patients who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive FIT had lower all-cause mortality at both 1 and 10 years compared with those who did not. Colonoscopy adherence after a positive FIT varied by demographic group, with higher completion rates among Hispanic and Asian patients and younger adults. Polyp detection was also higher in Hispanic versus non-Hispanic patients, with no differences among age groups, while CRC detection did not vary across any subgroup. These findings highlight missed opportunities for early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer and underscore the need for targeted interventions to improve colonoscopy follow-up in lower-adherence populations.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealthcare DisparitiesPatient ComplianceAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccult BloodRetrospective StudiesColonoscopy adherenceColorectal cancer screeningFecal immunochemical test (FIT)Health disparities

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.