ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026
Urinary Incontinence Among Female Patients with Lichen Sclerosus: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisLichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis with an autoimmune component, clinically observed to co-occur with pelvic floor disorders, particularly urinary incontinence (UI). However, the strength of this association remains unclear. This study was aimed at the quantitative synthesis of the prevalence of UI in female patients with LS and the risk of UI associated with LS.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Medline from inception to 29 December 2025. Observational studies reporting UI data in women with LS were included. Study quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. A single proportion meta-analysis pooling the prevalence of UI and a comparative meta-analysis calculating risk ratio for UI in LS versus non-LS controls were conducted.
resultsThirteen studies involving 52,002 participants were included. All studies involving 13,296 patients with LS were included for a single-proportion analysis. The pooled prevalence of UI was 0.23 (95% CI 0.12-0.38, I
conclusionsThis study suggests that LS in women might be associated with a significantly higher prevalence of UI. Despite considerable heterogeneity, the findings highlight the need for integrated, multidisciplinary care that includes routine urological assessment in the management of LS. Further prospective studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42517915What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.