ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Digitalis for heart failure: welcome back?]
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of cardiac glycosides (digitalis) for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has steadily declined in the era of modern prognosis-improving pharmacotherapy, given the lack of conclusive evidence from clinical trials.
objectivesThe evidence for the use of cardiac glycosides in HFrEF is presented based on both earlier and recent clinical trials, with corresponding recommendations. CURRENT DATA: The recently published DIGIT-HF trial demonstrated that low-dose digitoxin (serum concentrations of 8-18 ng/ml) reduced the primary outcome of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with symptomatic HFrEF well treated with guideline-recommended medical therapy. Patients with low blood pressure and higher heart rates appeared to derive particular benefit. This positive treatment effect was independent of age and sex as well as the presence of atrial fibrillation or impaired renal function. In contrast, digoxin did not significantly affect the primary outcomes in the earlier DIG or the recently completed DECISION trial, the latter involving low-dose digoxin and contemporary heart failure pharmacotherapy. Both trials demonstrated nominally favorable effects for digoxin on heart failure hospitalizations/visits (secondary outcome), which was further supported by a meta-analysis incorporating data from all three trials.
conclusionsDigitoxin (at low serum concentrations) is recommended for patients with HFrEF and persistent symptoms despite standard therapy, since, in contrast to digoxin, there are positive trial data demonstrating a reduction in mortality and heart failure hospitalizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42517908What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.