Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517908›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Digitalis for heart failure: welcome back?]

Udo Bavendiek, Johann Bauersachs

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Udo BavendiekKlinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. bavendiek.udo@mh-hannover.de.
Johann BauersachsKlinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of cardiac glycosides (digitalis) for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has steadily declined in the era of modern prognosis-improving pharmacotherapy, given the lack of conclusive evidence from clinical trials.

objectivesThe evidence for the use of cardiac glycosides in HFrEF is presented based on both earlier and recent clinical trials, with corresponding recommendations. CURRENT DATA: The recently published DIGIT-HF trial demonstrated that low-dose digitoxin (serum concentrations of 8-18 ng/ml) reduced the primary outcome of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with symptomatic HFrEF well treated with guideline-recommended medical therapy. Patients with low blood pressure and higher heart rates appeared to derive particular benefit. This positive treatment effect was independent of age and sex as well as the presence of atrial fibrillation or impaired renal function. In contrast, digoxin did not significantly affect the primary outcomes in the earlier DIG or the recently completed DECISION trial, the latter involving low-dose digoxin and contemporary heart failure pharmacotherapy. Both trials demonstrated nominally favorable effects for digoxin on heart failure hospitalizations/visits (secondary outcome), which was further supported by a meta-analysis incorporating data from all three trials.

conclusionsDigitoxin (at low serum concentrations) is recommended for patients with HFrEF and persistent symptoms despite standard therapy, since, in contrast to digoxin, there are positive trial data demonstrating a reduction in mortality and heart failure hospitalizations.

Indexed as

Cardiotonic AgentsDigitalis GlycosidesHeart FailureDigitoxinDigoxinHumansStroke VolumeCardiotonic AgentsDigitalis GlycosidesDigitoxinDigoxinCardiac glycosidesclinical trialsDigitoxinDigoxinHeart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.