Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517902›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Prognostic factors and treatment response in previously treated hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving Y-90 radioembolization combined with targeted-immunotherapy: an exploratory analysis.

Jianwei Chen, Xiaolong Wang, Xiaoqi Li, Qihong Chen, Yuemin Zhu, Dechun Zheng, Liting Wen, Juyi Wu, Yubin Hu, Shiguang Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jianwei ChenDepartment of Radiology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital (Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Fuzhou, China.
Xiaolong WangDepartment of Oncology and Vascular Interventional Therapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital (Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Fuzhou, China.
Xiaoqi LiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Hubei, China.
Qihong ChenDepartment of Interventional Vascular Surgery, The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, China.
Yuemin ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital (Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Fuzhou, China.
Dechun ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital (Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Fuzhou, China.
Liting WenDepartment of Radiology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital (Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Fuzhou, China.
Juyi WuDepartment of Radiology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital (Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Fuzhou, China.
Yubin HuDepartment of Oncology and Vascular Interventional Therapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital (Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Fuzhou, China.
Shiguang ChenDepartment of Oncology and Vascular Interventional Therapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital (Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Fuzhou, China.
Mingzhi HaoDepartment of Oncology and Vascular Interventional Therapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital (Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Fuzhou, China.
Wenchang YuDepartment of Oncology and Vascular Interventional Therapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital (Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Fuzhou, China.
Zhuting FangDepartment of Oncology and Vascular Interventional Therapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital (Fujian Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Fuzhou, China. ztfang@fjzlhospital.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6297-3067

Funding

Fujian Province Natural Science Foundation of China 2024J011105Fujian Provincial Health Technology Project 2024ZD01004Fujian Provincial Health Technology Project 2025QNB021Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province 2023Y9320Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian ProvinceJoint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province 2024Y9601National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2413500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate treatment response and identify factors associated with outcomes in previously treated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving Y-90 radioembolization combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy (Y-90 + TT + IT).

methodsThis retrospective study included 30 previously treated HCC patients (11 with prior surgery, 19 without) who received Y-90 + TT + IT. At a median follow-up of 9.7 months (95% CI, 8.5-13.9), 23 PFS events and 9 overall survival (OS) events occurred. Patient‑level response was assessed in 24 patients (all with PFS events or > 6‑month follow‑up without progression). Univariable Cox regression was used for PFS and OS; owing to few OS events (n = 9), OS analyses were exploratory. For PFS, an exploratory multivariable model (backward stepwise) was also constructed.

resultsObjective response rate was 37.5% (9/24) and disease control rate 75.0% (18/24); infiltrative imaging appearance was the only feature associated with non‑response (p = 0.042). Prior surgery was associated with worse PFS in both patient-level (HR 3.78, p = 0.004) and lesion-level (HR 3.32, p = 0.024) analyses; however, the lesion-level association was not confirmed in a sensitivity analysis restricted to one index lesion per patient (p = 0.128) and should be interpreted cautiously as it may reflect within‑patient clustering. Prior surgery remained significant in multivariable analysis (p = 0.004). In univariable analysis for OS, total bilirubin (p = 0.019), lesion number (p = 0.022), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT; p = 0.041), and tumor-to-normal liver uptake ratio (TNR; p = 0.008) were associated with OS.

conclusionsIn this exploratory cohort of previously treated HCC patients receiving Y-90 + TT + IT, prior surgery was associated with worse patient‑level PFS. Infiltrative imaging appearance was associated with non‑response. In univariable analysis, GGT, TNR, total bilirubin, and lesion number showed exploratory associations with OS. These findings generate hypotheses and require validation in larger prospective studies.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaImmunotherapyPrognostic factors.Targeted therapyY-90 radioembolization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.