ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Using Machine Learning to Automate the Analysis of an Olfactory Habituation-Dishabituation Task in Mice.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionImproving the efficiency and accuracy of annotation and extraction of performance data from mouse behavioral tasks will improve both the throughput and scientific value of preclinical research.
methodsHere, we present and validate an automated pipeline for the annotation and quantification of performance in a mouse olfactory habituation-dishabituation task, using a single side-view camera, resulting in occluded body parts. We created a pipeline for task analysis, combining DeepLabCut (DLC) for pose-estimation and SimBA, for behavioral classification to automatically quantify odor interaction (sniffing time) in a three-odor (water, familiar mouse social odor, novel mouse social odor) variant of the task. We used a subset of previously published, fully manually annotated datasets to train the models and unseen videos from the same study to validate the utility of our machine learning (ML) pipeline. RESULTS AND
conclusionOur analysis pipeline estimated behavioral performance in the task with high accuracy, and the data produces similar technical and biological results to manual methods when analyzed by linear mixed modeling. Thus, we validated the utility of our customized pipeline for the automated scoring of this mouse sensory task, and we discuss its strengths and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.