Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517875›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2026

Using Machine Learning to Automate the Analysis of an Olfactory Habituation-Dishabituation Task in Mice.

S Boyanova, M H Correa, R S Bains, F K Wiseman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S BoyanovaUK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3321-3160
M H CorreaUK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-7788
R S BainsMary Lyon Centre, Medical Research Council Harwell, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0443-7704
F K WisemanUK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9323-3548

Funding

Alzheimer's Research UK - Senior Research Fellowship ARUK-SRF2018A-001Medical Research Council MC_UP_2201/1UK Dementia Research Institute UKDRI-1014UK Dementia Research Institute UKDRI-CIP0202Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImproving the efficiency and accuracy of annotation and extraction of performance data from mouse behavioral tasks will improve both the throughput and scientific value of preclinical research.

methodsHere, we present and validate an automated pipeline for the annotation and quantification of performance in a mouse olfactory habituation-dishabituation task, using a single side-view camera, resulting in occluded body parts. We created a pipeline for task analysis, combining DeepLabCut (DLC) for pose-estimation and SimBA, for behavioral classification to automatically quantify odor interaction (sniffing time) in a three-odor (water, familiar mouse social odor, novel mouse social odor) variant of the task. We used a subset of previously published, fully manually annotated datasets to train the models and unseen videos from the same study to validate the utility of our machine learning (ML) pipeline. RESULTS AND

conclusionOur analysis pipeline estimated behavioral performance in the task with high accuracy, and the data produces similar technical and biological results to manual methods when analyzed by linear mixed modeling. Thus, we validated the utility of our customized pipeline for the automated scoring of this mouse sensory task, and we discuss its strengths and limitations.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalHabituation, PsychophysiologicMachine LearningOlfactory PerceptionSmellAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOdorantsautomationmouse behaviourolfaction

Identifiers

PMID42517875
PMCPMC13411289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.