ArticleJournal of vision2026
Perceptual consequences of retinal stabilization with high-frequency non-stroboscopic displays.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seeing on the fly: No need for space-to-time encoding; saccade-generated transients enable fast, parallel representation of space.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- The visual system does not operate like a camera.Journal of vision · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During natural fixation, small eye movements continually modulate the input to the retina. Previous studies have shown that this motion enhances sensitivity to fine spatial detail, a conclusion supported by findings of reduced sensitivity to high-but not low-spatial frequencies when stimuli are immobilized on the retina for brief periods of time. Most prior retinal stabilization studies have relied on fast-phosphor cathode ray tube (CRT) displays or adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopes (AOSLOs), both of which deliver temporally pulsed stimulation. This raises the question of whether stimulus flicker contributed to the previously observed perceptual impairments under retinal stabilization. Here, we replicate stabilization experiments using two types of fast displays that provide more continuous stimulation: liquid-crystal display (LCD) and organic light-emitting diode (OLED) monitors. We again find an impairment in sensitivity to high spatial frequencies under retinal stabilization. Analyses of the retinal input confirm high-quality stabilization within the temporal bandwidth of human vision. These results show that retinal stabilization effects are robust across display technologies and are little affected by the specific dynamics of modern displays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.