ArticleJournal of sleep research2026
Differences in Sleep Spindle Characteristics Between Children With Narcolepsy and Those With Other Causes of Subjective Sleepiness.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Central disorders of hypersomnolence are characterised by excessive daytime sleepiness. There has been growing interest in analysing sleep micro-architecture, to further understand how sleep is affected by these conditions. We investigated if sleep spindle activity differed between children with narcolepsy, idiopathic hypersomnolence (IH) and subjectively sleepy children with a non-diagnostic multiple sleep latency test, and individually age- and sex-matched controls. Twenty eight children with narcolepsy, 11 with IH and 26 with subjective sleepiness (aged 6-19 years) were included. Spindle activity was characterised as spindle density (number of spindles/min) and intensity (density × average duration) of central (C4) and frontal (F4) EEG electrodes for Slow and Fast spindles and combined (Slow&Fast) across the sleep period and also when separated into NREM sleep periods (NREMP) across the night. C4 Slow and Fast and F4 Slow spindle duration was longer in children with narcolepsy compared to their controls (p < 0.05 for all comparisons) and to those with subjective sleepiness (p < 0.05). In the children with narcolepsy and subjective sleepiness C4 spindle intensity was greater (p < 0.05 for both groups) compared to controls. C4 spindle density and intensity were lower at the beginning compared to the end of the night in the children with narcolepsy and subjective sleepiness (p < 0.05 for both groups). There were no relationships between spindle activity and parental reports of daytime sleepiness. Spindle characteristics differed between children with narcolepsy compared to controls and to children with undiagnosed subjective sleepiness. Our findings may aid in distinguishing between groups of children referred for assessment of excessive daytime sleepiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.