ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
Community-Driven Research Priorities for Genetic Counseling: Shaping the Future of Genetic Counseling Research by Centering Multicultural Perspectives.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Community-Driven Research Priorities for Genetic Counseling: Shaping the Future of Genetic Counseling Research by Centering Multicultural Perspectives.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-based participatory research (CBPR), a research approach that centers the collective strengths of community-researcher partnerships, can direct future genetic counseling (GC) research initiatives toward issues that are critical to communities most impacted by genomic healthcare disparities. Co-developed, innovative solutions to persistent research gaps may help address community access to and education about genomic healthcare. This study utilized a CBPR approach to develop a prioritized list of GC research directions that align with the goals and needs of representatives from racially/ethnically underrepresented communities in research. Twelve members from four community advisory boards (CABs) representing the Hispanic/Latino, Black/African American, Hmong, and Somali communities came together to complete three card sorting activities. Twenty cards describing research project ideas were developed through inductive qualitative content analysis of 22 meetings held with individual CABs (April 2023 to May 2025). Three members from each CAB first sorted their own CAB's project idea cards. Then, members were divided into three new small groups with one member from each CAB. Cross-CAB groups completed a second card sorting activity to identify their most important project ideas, followed by a third sorting activity to prioritize their top card. The cross-CAB identified three research priorities: (A) work with primary care clinics to encourage more people to see a genetic counselor, (B) learn which GC techniques are best according to patients and the community, and (C) investigate whether educational projects make people more aware of GC or not. By centering multicultural perspectives in the creation of a GC research agenda, the future of GC research can be better aligned with the priorities of communities and eventually support novel, tailored strategies to address genomic healthcare disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.