Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517492›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2026

Rural Health Workforce Development Through the AHEC Scholars Model.

Danielle Bruno, Taylor O'Shaughnessy, Jennifer D Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danielle BrunoDepartment of Family Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Taylor O'ShaughnessyDepartment of Family Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3950-5930
Jennifer D TaylorDepartment of Family Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2574-1895

Funding

Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration U77HP23068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt is widely understood that access to health care services is crucial to achieving and maintaining good health. The Indiana AHEC Scholars program was developed to help combat these shortages by providing post-secondary health professions students with a didactic curriculum paired with community-based rural and/or medically underserved experiences in local communities. This study aimed to assess any relationship between students' engagement in the AHEC Scholars program and both their intent to and actual practice in a rural community post-graduation.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study on five cohorts of post-secondary health professions students who engaged in the AHEC Scholars program between 2018 and 2023. We conducted a quantitative analysis using a pre-mid-and post-program evaluation. A paired t-test was conducted to assess a change between a student's self-reported intent to practice in a rural community at the start of the program compared to the midway point of the program and the end of the program. Additionally, a chi-square test was conducted to assess the relationship between the students' reported intent to practice in a rural area at the end of the Scholars program and their reported practice location 1 year post-program.

resultsA statistically significant difference was found between the students' intent to practice in a rural setting before and after their involvement in the AHEC Scholars program with the post-experience scores being significantly higher than the pre-experience scores (p ≤ 0.01). Additionally, we found a significant change over time, as the students' reported interest in rural practice increased between the start of the program and the mid-point, (p ≤ 0.01), as well as a between the midpoint of the program and the end (p ≤ 0.01). Using a scale wherein 1 is low and 5 is high, the mean score for students' intent to practice in a rural area between the pretest, mid-point, and posttest evaluation were 3.02, 3.46, and 3.67, respectively. A significant correlation was also found between the students' intent to practice in a rural area and actual rural practice, p ≤ 0.001. At the time of 1-year follow-up, 24.6% (n = 92) of individuals reported employment in a rural area.

conclusionOur study highlighted that incorporating didactic and community-based experiences may contribute to health profession education students choosing to practice in rural communities when entering the workforce. Our findings demonstrate the vital need to develop clear career trajectories for health professional students to learn about rural-based care as a strategy for enticing practice in those communities.

Indexed as

Rural Health ServicesCohort StudiesCurriculumFemaleHumansIndianaMaleMedically Underserved AreaRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42517492
PMCPMC13411191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.