Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517435›Full record

ReviewChemSusChem2026

Green Solvent Systems for Cellulose Dissolution and Regeneration: Hydrogen-Bond Engineering Toward Sustainable Functional Materials.

Wen Wang, Yaxu Sun, Zhihan Tong, Haipeng Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemSusChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wen WangState Key Laboratory of Woody Oil Resources Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0720-1659
Yaxu SunState Key Laboratory of Woody Oil Resources Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Zhihan TongState Key Laboratory of Woody Oil Resources Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3116-6197
Haipeng YuState Key Laboratory of Woody Oil Resources Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0634-7913

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32330072National Natural Science Foundation of China 32501591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulose, the most abundant natural biopolymer, offers a sustainable alternative to petroleum-based products. However, its intrinsic and robust hydrogen-bonding network prevents thermal processing, severely hindering its practical use. Green solvent systems capable of disrupting this network under mild conditions without significant degradation have emerged as a transformative platform. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of cellulose dissolution, from its hierarchical supramolecular structure and swelling mechanisms to recent advances in green solvents, including ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents. We highlight how solvation chemistry directly influences subsequent regeneration strategies (specifically solvent-induced phase transitions and thermally driven assembly), enabling precise control over hydrogen-bond reconstruction and molecular chain orientation. By bridging dissolution mechanisms with advanced manufacturing, this review elucidates design principles for creating high-performance cellulosic materials. We conclude with a forward-looking perspective on integrating artificial intelligence for solvent screening, scaling up sustainable processes, and realizing the full potential of cellulose-based smart materials in flexible electronics, biomedicine, and beyond.

Indexed as

cellulosedissolution and regenerationfunctional materialsgreen solventsmolecular assembly

Identifiers

PMID42517435
PMCPMC13410444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.