ArticleTheScientificWorldJournal2026
Antidiabetic and Hepatorenal Protective Effects of Annona reticulata Linn. Leaf Extract Alone and in Combination With Glibenclamide in Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Rats.
Article in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pharmacological properties of Annona reticulata Linn. (Annonaceae) leaves, as reported by some tribal tribes, were investigated in this study. The antidiabetic and liver-renal protective potentials of methanolic leaf fraction and its combination with glibenclamide were evaluated in rats having alloxan-induced diabetes at doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg body weight; demonstrated notable antidiabetic potential which was dose-dependent. Following 21 days course of treatment, methanol leaf fraction (400 mg/kg) and combination of extract (200 mg/kg) along with glibenclamide (2.5 mg/kg) exhibited fasting blood glucose levels of 5.25 ± 0.06 mmol/L and 6.02 ± 0.07 mmol/L; whereas standard drug glibenclamide (5 mg/kg) showed fasting blood glucose level of 5.91 ± 0.09 mmol/L. Furthermore, the diabetic rats in extract group (400 mg/kg dosage) and in combination group showed body weight reduction values of 14.67 and 16.5 gm; which was lower than the value obtained group of rats treated with glibenclamide alone (21.83 gm). Additionally, the extract and its combination with glibenclamide were found to have significant protective impacts on the kidney and liver (p < 0.001) and to aid in the maintenance of lipid profile even in the presence of diabetes; these effects were comparable with the outcomes obtained from standard drug. Although diabetic rats demonstrated elevated liver and kidney markers levels, the groups of mice treated with methanolic leaf extract at both 200 and 400 mg/kg dosages exhibited notable maintenance of both liver and kidney markers levels. Furthermore, combination of methanol extract and glibenclamide showed serum ALT, AST, bilirubin and creatinine, BUN values of 15.20 ± 1.58 IU/L, 10.73 ± 0.45 IU/L, 3.60 ± 0.22 μmol/L; and 0.73 ± 0.03 mg/dL, 18.13 ± 2.13 mg/dL (p < 0.001); which were markedly lower than the values obtained from diabetic control rats. Moreover, both methanolic leaf extract and standard drug glibenclamide as well as their combination exhibited beneficial effect in the maintenance of serum TC, TG, LDL, and HDL levels. Methanolic extract at 400 mg/kg dosage and the combination demonstrated serum TC, TG, LDL, and HDL values of 84.33 ± 3.00 mg/dL, 62.32 ± 3.13 mg/dL, 42.67 ± 3.01 mg/dL, 37.43 ± 6.47 mg/dL; and 80.43 ± 3.53 mg/dL, 65.20 ± 6.29 mg/dL, 44.50 ± 2.88 mg/dL, 43.52 ± 3.33 mg/dL (p < 0.001), respectively. Additionally, the extract's potential components that may have played crucial roles in achieving these bioactivities were identified using the reports from the GC-MS analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.