ArticleAIDS (London, England)2026
Maternal and pregnancy outcomes in women offered daily oral preexposure prophylaxis during pregnancy and postpartum.
Article in AIDS (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare maternal safety and pregnancy outcomes among women who did and did not use daily oral emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during pregnancy and postpartum.
designParallel cohort design, with follow-up from pregnancy to 6 months postpartum.
settingSeven research clinics in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe.
participantsThree hundred fifty pregnant women aged 16-24 years at 32 weeks or less gestation, meeting local criteria for PrEP. At entry, PrEP initiators and decliners were enrolled 2 : 1. Participants could start or stop PrEP at any time.
main outcome measuresMaternal adverse events were defined as grade ≥3 signs, symptoms, and diagnoses, and grade ≥2 chemistry abnormalities according to Division of AIDS toxicity tables. Adverse pregnancy outcomes included fetal loss, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age.
resultsFrom March to December 2022, 350 eligible participants enrolled: 229 initiating and 121 declining PrEP at entry. Median duration of PrEP use was 34 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 16-40). Sixty maternal adverse events were reported over 230.3 person-years (incidence rate: 25.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 20.0-32.8). Although those on PrEP had higher rates of adverse events, this was not statistically significant (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.84, 95% CI: 0.53-6.30). Most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were complications of pregnancy or delivery. Five (8%) were considered related to PrEP use. Among those with delivery information, 79 (24%) participants reported adverse pregnancy outcomes, with no differences between PrEP groups. No participants acquired HIV infections during follow-up.
conclusionDaily oral FTC-TDF remains a well tolerated and essential component of HIV prevention in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.