ArticleCirculation2026
A Multitask Deep Learning Model for Pediatric Echocardiography Analysis.
Article in Circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCongenital heart defects afflict ≈1% of all births worldwide. Although deep learning has shown significant promise in automating and improving adult echocardiography analysis, existing pediatric-based models are often limited to single tasks and specific echocardiographic views. To address this, we introduce EchoAI-Peds, a multitask deep learning model for pediatric echocardiography. Our model was developed using the most comprehensive set of pediatric labels to date and is designed to integrate information from multiple views simultaneously.
methodsWe trained a video-based vision transformer to simultaneously detect 28 congenital heart defects, structural and functional abnormalities, repairs, and interventions directly from complete pediatric echocardiography studies with multiple videos. Our model was developed using >700 000 videos derived from >12 000 studies performed at Stanford Medicine between 2014 and 2021. Specifically, our model was trained on 10 815 studies (median age, 8 [IQR 2-14] years; 45% female) and validated on 1294 studies (median age, 9 [IQR 2-15] years; 46% female). Model efficacy was tested on an internal held-out data set of 1336 studies from that same period. In addition, model generalizability was tested on a spatially and temporally distinct patient cohort at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia using 2121 studies performed between 2024 and 2025.
resultsOur model achieved macroaveraged area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90-0.92) on the internal test set (median age, 8 [IQR 2-14] years; 47% female) and AUROC values of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.88-0.90) on the external test set (median age, 6 [IQR 0.92-13] years; 44.4% female). Moreover, EchoAI-Peds significantly outperformed adult-based echocardiography foundation models trained on substantially larger data sets, including EchoCLIP (internal AUROC=0.58, 95% CI, 0.56-0.60; external AUROC=0.61, 95% CI, 0.59-0.62) and EchoPrime (internal AUROC=0.58, 95% CI, 0.57-0.61; external AUROC=0.60, 95% CI, 0.59-0.62). Finally, our model demonstrated robust performance across patient age, patient sex, and studies with varying numbers of videos.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate the remarkable potential for multitask deep learning models to aid the interpretation of pediatric echocardiograms. In addition, our results underscore the need for models that are specifically tailored to pediatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.