Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517196›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2026

An unattended image-processing pipeline for on-the-fly quality assessment and 3D exploration in cryo-EM.

Daniel Marchán Torres, Pablo Conesa, Alberto Garcia, Mikel Iceta, Ludovic Broche, Marcos Gragera, Romain Linares, Hok Sau Kwong, Francisco Javier Chichón, Olof Svensson and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Daniel Marchán TorresCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Spain.
Pablo ConesaCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Spain.
Alberto GarciaCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Spain.
Mikel IcetaCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Spain.
Ludovic BrocheThe European Synchrotron (ESRF), France.ORCID 0000-0001-7704-0762
Marcos GrageraCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3097-1743
Romain LinaresEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9226-3382
Hok Sau KwongThe European Synchrotron (ESRF), France.
Francisco Javier ChichónCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Spain.
Olof SvenssonThe European Synchrotron (ESRF), France.ORCID 0000-0002-6937-7039
Rocío ArranzCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5321-0915
Grégory EffantinUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Institut de Biologie Structurale (IBS), France.ORCID 0000-0002-6957-0875
Eaazhisai KandiahThe European Synchrotron (ESRF), France.ORCID 0000-0002-9877-7621
José María CarazoCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Spain.
Carlos O S SorzanoCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9473-283X

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación CEX2023-001386-SComunidad de Madrid S2022/BMD-7232European Regional Development Fund PID2019-104757RB-100European Regional Development Fund PID2022-136594NB-I00Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PRE2020-093527Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades 716450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-particle analysis (SPA) by cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has become a cornerstone of structural biology; yet, the workflow from data acquisition to a 3D structure remains a time-consuming, manual and significant task. Researchers often invest days of valuable microscope time collecting massive datasets with little to no real-time feedback on sample quality or the ultimate feasibility of achieving a high-resolution reconstruction. To address this challenge, we have developed an automated, end-to-end processing workflow designed for on-the-fly analysis. Built within the Scipion framework, the pipeline integrates a cascade of automated quality-control filters, a novel consensus-based strategy for training a data-specific particle-picking model, and a parallel 2D/3D validation scheme to ensure robust processing outcomes. We validated the workflow on a diverse benchmark of 32 datasets (CryoPPP), achieving a 94% overall processing success rate and obtaining high-quality 3D reconstructions in 78% of cases. Real-world deployment at the European Synchrotron (ESRF) cryo-EM facility further validated its practical utility: the pipeline demonstrated processing speeds exceeding data acquisition, delivering preliminary 3D maps in under 3 h. Approximately 70% of user experiments converged to interpretable structures, with half achieving 3-4 Å resolution, despite the inherent complexity of facility-collected samples. By providing researchers with rapid, actionable feedback and identifying both promising and problematic datasets in real time, this workflow transforms cryo-EM data collection from a passive process into an active, data-driven experiment. It serves as a powerful diagnostic and decision-support tool, accelerating structural determination and optimizing microscope time in high-throughput cryo-EM environments.

Indexed as

Cryoelectron MicroscopyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalQuality ControlSoftwareautomationcryo-EMon-the-fly processingScipionSPA

Identifiers

PMID42517196
PMCPMC13431645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.