ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2026
An unattended image-processing pipeline for on-the-fly quality assessment and 3D exploration in cryo-EM.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-particle analysis (SPA) by cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has become a cornerstone of structural biology; yet, the workflow from data acquisition to a 3D structure remains a time-consuming, manual and significant task. Researchers often invest days of valuable microscope time collecting massive datasets with little to no real-time feedback on sample quality or the ultimate feasibility of achieving a high-resolution reconstruction. To address this challenge, we have developed an automated, end-to-end processing workflow designed for on-the-fly analysis. Built within the Scipion framework, the pipeline integrates a cascade of automated quality-control filters, a novel consensus-based strategy for training a data-specific particle-picking model, and a parallel 2D/3D validation scheme to ensure robust processing outcomes. We validated the workflow on a diverse benchmark of 32 datasets (CryoPPP), achieving a 94% overall processing success rate and obtaining high-quality 3D reconstructions in 78% of cases. Real-world deployment at the European Synchrotron (ESRF) cryo-EM facility further validated its practical utility: the pipeline demonstrated processing speeds exceeding data acquisition, delivering preliminary 3D maps in under 3 h. Approximately 70% of user experiments converged to interpretable structures, with half achieving 3-4 Å resolution, despite the inherent complexity of facility-collected samples. By providing researchers with rapid, actionable feedback and identifying both promising and problematic datasets in real time, this workflow transforms cryo-EM data collection from a passive process into an active, data-driven experiment. It serves as a powerful diagnostic and decision-support tool, accelerating structural determination and optimizing microscope time in high-throughput cryo-EM environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.