ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2026
Examining The Contralateral Repeated Bout Effect in Females While Accounting for Menstrual Cycle-Related Estrogen Fluctuations.
Article in International journal of exercise science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Contralateral Repeated Bout Effect (CL-RBE) occurs when an initial exercise protects the opposite, unexercised muscle from muscle damage during subsequent exercises. CL-RBE has been widely demonstrated in male populations, but research involving females remains limited. Recent research, including exclusively female subjects, reported an absence of CL-RBE, suggesting a possible sex-specific difference in the phenomenon. This null result may have been due to estrogen changes during the menstrual cycle, since estrogen has been suggested to protect from muscle damage. Therefore, this study controlled for estrogen fluctuations in fourteen females while testing for CL-RBE. Each participant completed the same eccentric exercise consisting of 60 repetitions on opposite arms, two weeks apart, with muscle damage markers assessed pre-exercise, immediately (muscle strength only), 24 hours, and 48 hours post-exercise. Significant main effects of time were observed in strength (p = .006) and soreness (p < .001), confirming muscle damage after the eccentric exercises. A significant bout effect was observed for strength (p < .028). However, no bout × time interaction emerged for any measured marker (p > .05). These findings suggest that estrogen fluctuation alone may not explain the absence of CL-RBE in females, and support emerging evidence of sex-specific differences in CL-RBE. While this study incorporated increased exercise volume and controlled for estrogen fluctuation, limitations include the indirect estimation of estrogen levels, which may have allowed subtle CL-RBE to go undetected. This highlights the need for future investigation into female-specific mechanisms governing muscle adaptation to develop evidence-based rehabilitation and training protocols that accurately reflect female physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.