SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
A meta-analysis of influencing factors of non-suicidal self-injury behavior in adolescents with depression.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to analyze the influencing factors of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in adolescents with depression. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for observational studies on factors influencing NSSI behavior in adolescents with depression published between 1 January 2010 and 7 May 2026. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses were performed in RevMan 5.4 using mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals. Between-study heterogeneity was evaluated using the χ² test and I² statistic, and fixed- or random-effects models were applied as appropriate. Results: In total, 11 studies were included, involving 529 patients in the study group and 1,716 patients in the control group. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, the study group had significantly higher scores for interpersonal problems, negative emotions, alexithymia, and negative self-esteem [MD = 5.88, 95% CI (3.19, 8.57), P < 0.001], somatic symptom scores [MD = 5.20, 95% CI (-0.03, 10.43), P = 0.05], emotional deficit [MD = 6.82, 95% CI (0.32, 13.31), P = 0.04], Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores [MD = 2.97, 95% CI (1.76, 4.18), P < 0.001], emotional abuse [MD = 2.10, 95% CI (1.06, 3.13), P < 0.001], physical abuse [MD = 0.64, 95% CI (0.08, 1.20), P = 0.025], sexual abuse [MD = 0.27, 95% CI (0.12, 0.42), P < 0.001], emotional neglect [MD = 1.67, 95% CI (0.37, 2.97), P = 0.009], physical neglect [MD = 0.81, 95% CI (0.43, 1.19), P < 0.001], and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire total scores [MD = 8.93, 95% CI (3.63, 14.24), P < 0.001]. Conclusion: Adolescents with depressive disorders and NSSI tend to exhibit more severe depressive symptoms, maladaptive emotional regulation patterns, negative coping styles, and higher levels of childhood trauma exposure than those without NSSI. These psychosocial and emotional factors may play important roles in the occurrence and maintenance of NSSI behaviors. Early psychological assessment and targeted intervention may help reduce the risk of NSSI in adolescents with depressive disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.