Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517135›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

The informational dysregulation framework of addiction (IDFA): an information-processing model of relapse in opioid use disorder.

Ovie Martin Albert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ovie Martin AlbertDepartment of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid use disorder is associated with high relapse risk and a persistent mismatch between intention and behavior. Contemporary neurobiological models have clarified the roles of reward learning, reinforcement, habit formation, salience attribution, stress adaptation, and executive-control dysfunction in relapse vulnerability. However, these mechanisms are not always translated into a clinically usable framework that links neurobiology with lived experience and relapse-prevention planning. The Informational Dysregulation Framework of Addiction (IDFA) was developed in response to this translational need, through structured integrative synthesis of addiction neuroscience, computational psychiatry, information theory, and clinical relapse research. IDFA conceptualizes relapse vulnerability in opioid use disorder as dysregulation in how the brain predicts, updates, and integrates information under uncertainty. The framework organizes relapse processes across three interacting domains: precision dysregulation, entropy and complexity disruption, and awareness and integration impairment. Together, these processes form a self-reinforcing loop that narrows informational bandwidth and behavioral flexibility across relapse trajectories. Alongside established reward- and habit-based accounts, IDFA provides an integrative information-processing perspective on how prediction, updating, and action selection become dysregulated during relapse vulnerability. This approach also generates clinically relevant hypotheses regarding relapse prediction, individualized case formulation, and mechanism-informed intervention planning across pharmacologic and psychosocial treatments.

Indexed as

active inferencecomputational psychiatryinteroceptionneural complexityopioid use disorderpredictive processingrelapserelapse prevention

Identifiers

PMID42517135
PMCPMC13403627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.