ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Machine learning based prediction of antimicrobial resistance
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: A retrospective analysis conducted using routine microbiology laboratory data collected between 2019 and 2024. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing included multiple agents across major antimicrobial classes, allowing classification of isolates into defined resistance phenotypes. Multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and pan-drug-resistant (PDR) profiles were determined using standard class-based definitions. In parallel, several supervised machine learning models were developed and evaluated, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Extra Trees Classifier, Classifier Chains (multilabel classification), Deep Neural Network (DNN), Voting Ensemble, and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Models were trained using the training dataset and subsequently evaluated on the testing dataset to assess predictive performance and generalizability. Results: Over the five-year study period, Conclusions: Collectively, these findings underscore the increasing clinical burden of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.