ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Suicide prevention in primary health care among socially vulnerable populations: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Suicide remains a major public health challenge worldwide, particularly among socially vulnerable populations who experience disproportionate exposure to social determinants associated with suicide risk and barriers to mental healthcare. Primary health care (PHC) is often the first point of contact with healthcare services and therefore plays a critical role in suicide prevention. Methods: This narrative review was conducted according to the SANRA guidelines. A structured literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed to identify evidence on suicide prevention interventions implemented in PHC and their applicability to socially vulnerable populations. The review focused on intervention characteristics, implementation approaches, reported outcomes, and challenges relevant to PHC practice. Results: The reviewed literature indicates that suicide prevention in PHC relies on multiple complementary strategies, including suicide risk screening, collaborative care models, safety planning interventions, brief psychological interventions, telehealth approaches, continuity-of-care programs, and provider training. Evidence suggests that multicomponent and integrated approaches are generally more effective than isolated interventions. Socially vulnerable populations, including people experiencing homelessness, poverty, unemployment, migration, domestic violence, substance use disorders, social isolation, disability, and social marginalization, face additional barriers to accessing mental healthcare and suicide prevention services. Effective interventions frequently combine clinical care with community, social, and support services to address both mental health needs and underlying social determinants of suicide risk. Conclusion: Suicide prevention in PHC requires integrated, multidisciplinary, and person-centered approaches that extend beyond risk identification alone. Strengthening service integration, continuity of care, provider capacity, and intersectoral collaboration may improve suicide prevention efforts, particularly among socially vulnerable populations. Further research is needed to evaluate implementation strategies and intervention effectiveness in diverse healthcare settings, especially in low- and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.