Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517107›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Targeted adult hearing loss screening in the UK: policy options for equitable implementation through health-service pathways.

Francesco Aletta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Francesco AlettaInstitute for Environmental Design and Engineering, Bartlett School of Environment Energy and Resources, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult hearing loss is common, disabling, and frequently under-detected, with help-seeking often delayed and unmet need unevenly distributed across populations. In the UK, adult hearing-loss screening is not currently recommended, and detection largely depends on self-recognition, primary-care presentation, and referral. This Policy Brief examines three policy options: maintaining the status quo, introducing age-based screening at 60, 65 and 70 years, and implementing targeted risk-based screening through existing health-service pathways for adults at elevated risk of cognitive decline. Appraisal against public health impact, feasibility, equity, and economic considerations suggests that targeted risk-based screening is the most immediately viable option. A phased pilot embedded in dementia, mild cognitive impairment, NHS Health Check, and audiology pathways could generate implementation evidence while improving equitable access to hearing care.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHearing LossMass ScreeningAgedHumansUnited Kingdomaudiometrydementiahearing lossNHS Health Checkscreening

Identifiers

PMID42517107
PMCPMC13402552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.