ArticleCase reports in surgery2026
Laparoscopic Ovarian Metastasectomy During Intraperitoneal Administration of Paclitaxel Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: A Report of Six Cases.
Article in Case reports in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic Ovarian Metastasectomy During Intraperitoneal Administration of Paclitaxel Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: A Report of Six Cases.Case reports in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel therapy with intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 is a novel treatment for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination; however, its effectiveness against ovarian metastases remains limited. In such cases, ovarian metastasectomy may be considered as an alternative to chemotherapy, but its safety and efficacy are unclear. We reported the six cases of laparoscopic ovarian metastasectomy for gastric cancer during IP and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 therapy. The median patient age was 40.5 years, and ovarian metastases were metachronous in five cases. All six surgeries were completed successfully without complications, adhesions, or conversion to open surgery. The median interval between ovarian metastasectomy and resumption of IP paclitaxel chemotherapy was 11.5 days. Three patients had a large amount of ascites before surgery, but the ascites decreased after the procedure. Four patients died from cancer, with a median postoperative survival of 18.5 months, excluding two patients who remained alive. Laparoscopic ovarian metastasectomy was feasible when peritoneal dissemination was well controlled by IP paclitaxel, and there were no strong adhesions around the ovarian metastases, which were presumed to have spread via lymphatic or hematogenous routes. Furthermore, ovarian metastasectomy reduced postoperative ascites formation, and the minimally invasive approach enabled the early resumption of IP paclitaxel therapy after a short treatment suspension. As a limitation, it was difficult to evaluate improvement in oncologic outcomes because of strong selection bias. In conclusion, laparoscopic ovarian metastasectomy is a safe and viable option for selective patients; however, further research is needed to confirm its long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.