ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2026
Comparison of Controlled Articular Rotations and Static Stretching on Hip Internal Rotation Range of Motion.
Article in International journal of exercise science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Range of motion (ROM) deficits of the hip can contribute to many musculoskeletal dysfunctions throughout the body. Specifically, lack of hip internal rotation (IR) ROM has been correlated with increased likelihood of anterior cruciate ligament injury, fall risk, low back pain, and upper extremity injury. Controlled Articular Rotations (CARs), a form of dynamic stretching, has gained popularity as a treatment strategy for improving joint ROM. The purpose of this study was to compare the acute effects of the CARs protocol and static stretching (SS) on hip IR ROM in a young adult population with limited hip mobility. Twenty-eight young adults (13 M; 15 F) aged 21-26 years completed the study. Exclusion criteria included hip IR passive ROM (PROM) >35 degrees or history of hip pathology/surgery. Participants were randomized into a CARs group or SS group. Hip IR ROM was measured prior to the performance of the stretching program, immediately post-intervention, and 15-minutes post-intervention. A 2x3 repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant group x time interaction (p=0.193) and no significant main effect of group (p=0.536). However, there was a significant main effect of time (p<0.001). Post-hoc comparisons showed significant increases in ROM from pre- to immediate post-intervention (p<0.001) and from pre- to 15-minutes post-intervention(p<0.001), with no significant difference between immediate post- and 15-minutes post-intervention (p=1.00). These results support the use of both SS and CARs as effective interventions to improve hip IR ROM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.