ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Clinical Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Gluteal Augmentation: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: Clinical Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Gluteal Augmentation: A Retrospective Study-Erratum.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hyaluronic acid fillers are increasingly being used for gluteal augmentation as a minimally invasive alternative to fat grafting and silicone implants. Despite their clinical appeal, limited data exist on their efficacy and safety in buttock enhancement, and they are not yet regarded as a standard of care compared with fat grafting or implants. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study, reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. In this retrospective study, 26 female patients underwent gluteal augmentation with cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler at a single clinic in Seoul. Eligibility criteria included adults 20-55 years of age; the treated cohort ranged from 25 to 47 years (mean age 34.6 y). A total volume of 200-360 mL was injected subcutaneously using a 16G blunt-tip cannula, avoiding high-risk anatomical zones. Results: Posttreatment photographs revealed consistent improvements in gluteal projection, contour, and symmetry. The upper and superolateral buttock regions showed the most prominent enhancement. Minor, self-limited adverse events occurred in 5 patients (19.2%), including localized swelling (n = 3), ecchymosis (n = 2), and transient firmness (n = 2). No major complications such as vascular compromise,deep infection, or filler migration were observed over 6 months. Conclusions: Hyaluronic acid filler can be safely and effectively used for buttock augmentation, offering a nonsurgical option with immediate aesthetic benefit and a favorable safety profile.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.