Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517057›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Clinicians' views on a patient decision aid for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Hillary S King, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Benjamin H Levi, Sol De Jesus, Harini Sarva, Laura Y Cabrera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hillary S KingThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Jennifer Blumenthal-BarbyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Benjamin H LeviPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Sol De JesusPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Harini SarvaWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Laura Y CabreraThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: For people with Parkinson's disease (PD), deciding whether to pursue deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become increasingly complex. Evidence suggests current approaches to collaborative decision-making may fall short of accepted standards. Thus, a decision support intervention, such as a patient decision aid (PtDA) may be warranted. PtDAs have been shown to improve patients' knowledge, expectations, and participation in decision-making for other, similar healthcare decisions. We therefore sought to assess neurologists' awareness of, and experience using, PtDAs, and to solicit their opinions on the ideal features of a PtDA for PD patients considering DBS. Methods: Sixteen United States-based neurology clinicians were interviewed about their experiences in treating and counseling PD patients considering DBS. These semi-structured interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Seven general neurologists, eight movement disorders specialists, and one registered nurse in a movement practice participated in interviews. None of the clinicians had experience using a patient decision aid, and many were unfamiliar with the concept altogether. All largely expressed optimism about the potential utility of a PtDA for PD patients considering DBS. There was less consensus about the ideal format, content, and implementation of such a PtDA. Conclusion: Healthcare providers recognize the potential benefits of a PtDA to engage PD patients considering DBS. However, input from other stakeholders-particularly the patients themselves-is essential to validate these findings.

Indexed as

clinicians perspectivesdecision makingdeep brain stimulationParkinson diseasepatient decision aid

Identifiers

PMID42517057
PMCPMC13402567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.