ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Association between early cognitive rehabilitation and long-term cognitive recovery in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the association between early cognitive rehabilitation (E-CR) and long-term cognitive, functional, and biomarker outcomes in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 185 patients with mTBI who completed at least 12 months of follow-up. E-CR was defined as at least three cognitive rehabilitation sessions within 30 days after injury, whereas patients without rehabilitation within 30 days or with rehabilitation initiated after 30 days were classified as the Non-early-CR group. Cognitive outcomes were assessed using MoCA scores at 6 and 12 months, and functional outcomes included ADL, GOS-E, and return to work or study. Serum NfL, GFAP, and IL-6 were longitudinally analyzed as exploratory biomarkers. Results: Among 185 patients, 91 were included in the E-CR group and 94 in the Non-early-CR group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. At 12 months, the E-CR group showed greater MoCA improvement than the Non-early-CR group (ΔMoCA: 7.03 vs. 3.01, Conclusion: E-CR was associated with better long-term cognitive and functional outcomes and with more favorable exploratory biomarker trajectories in patients with mTBI. Prospective studies are needed to confirm causality and clarify underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.