Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517053›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2026

Ciprofol versus Propofol Combined with Alfentanil for Respiratory Adverse Events in Overweight Patients Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Yang Zhang, Dongdong Liang, Shanshan Liu, Sunrui Yu, Ting Qiu, Haibo Guo, Xiangying Gao, Xiaoqi Li, Xi Li, Junlu Wang and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yang Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Dongdong Liang *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Shanshan LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Sunrui YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-8026-0060
Ting QiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Haibo GuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Xiangying GaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoqi LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Xi LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Junlu WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Qinxue DaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2516-5798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Respiratory management remains a major challenge during painless endoscopy in overweight or obese patients because of altered body fat distribution and reduced pulmonary reserve. This study evaluated whether ciprofol could reduce respiratory adverse events compared with propofol during painless gastroscopy in this population. Methods: In this single-center, prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial, 106 overweight or obese patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either propofol (2 mg/kg) or ciprofol (0.4 mg/kg) following intravenous alfentanil (5 μg/kg). The primary outcome was the overall incidence of respiratory adverse events from anesthesia induction to completion of endoscopy, including hypoxemia (SpO Results: A total of 106 patients completed the study (53 per group). The incidence of respiratory adverse events was significantly lower in the ciprofol group than in the propofol group (33.96% vs. 66.04%, P=0.001). The lowest intraoperative SpO Conclusion: In overweight or obese patients undergoing painless gastroscopy, ciprofol at 0.4 mg/kg significantly reduced respiratory adverse events, improved oxygenation, and decreased injection pain compared with propofol. These findings suggest that ciprofol may be a preferable anesthetic option for painless endoscopy in this population. Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2600117367.

Indexed as

AlfentanilGastroscopyOverweightPropofolAdultAnesthetics, IntravenousCyclopropanesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSingle-Blind Method(2-(1R)-1-cyclopropyl)ethyl-6-isopropyl-phenolAlfentanilAnesthetics, IntravenousCyclopropanesPropofolciprofoloverweight patientspainless endoscopyrespiratory adverse events

Identifiers

PMID42517053
PMCPMC13404185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.