Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2026
Ciprofol versus Propofol Combined with Alfentanil for Respiratory Adverse Events in Overweight Patients Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methodological Considerations Regarding Respiratory Safety and Recovery in Overweight or Obese Patients Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Respiratory management remains a major challenge during painless endoscopy in overweight or obese patients because of altered body fat distribution and reduced pulmonary reserve. This study evaluated whether ciprofol could reduce respiratory adverse events compared with propofol during painless gastroscopy in this population. Methods: In this single-center, prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial, 106 overweight or obese patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either propofol (2 mg/kg) or ciprofol (0.4 mg/kg) following intravenous alfentanil (5 μg/kg). The primary outcome was the overall incidence of respiratory adverse events from anesthesia induction to completion of endoscopy, including hypoxemia (SpO Results: A total of 106 patients completed the study (53 per group). The incidence of respiratory adverse events was significantly lower in the ciprofol group than in the propofol group (33.96% vs. 66.04%, P=0.001). The lowest intraoperative SpO Conclusion: In overweight or obese patients undergoing painless gastroscopy, ciprofol at 0.4 mg/kg significantly reduced respiratory adverse events, improved oxygenation, and decreased injection pain compared with propofol. These findings suggest that ciprofol may be a preferable anesthetic option for painless endoscopy in this population. Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2600117367.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.