Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517047›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Early warning scores for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection.

Mao Hu, Nan Xie, Lvna Xiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mao HuEmergency Department of West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Nan XieEmergency Department of West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lvna XiangDepartment of Outpatient, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of early warning score (EWS) in predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients diagnosed with AAD who presented to the emergency department between January 1 and December 31, 2022. Collected data included demographic information, clinical characteristics, EWS, laboratory findings, and time to computed tomography angiography (CTA). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to dissection type (A vs. B). Results: A total of 510 AAD patients were included, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 33.3%. Univariable analysis revealed that older age, Type A AAD, male sex, elevated EWS, higher lactate, elevated BUN, lower bicarbonate, and shorter time to CTA were significantly associated with mortality (all Conclusion: NEWS demonstrated the highest discriminative performance among the evaluated EWS and may serve as a useful tool for initial risk stratification in patients with AAD. Type A AAD and surgical treatment were the only independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, highlighting the importance of timely surgical intervention for improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

acute aortic dissectionearly warning scoresin-hospital mortalitynational early warning scoreprognosis

Identifiers

PMID42517047
PMCPMC13402407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.