ArticleInternational journal of transgender health2026
Development and validation of the multidimensional transgender and nonbinary resilience scale.
Article in International journal of transgender health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Get to Know My Community": Community-Driven Guidance for Future Transgender and Nonbinary Focused Research.Journal of community psychology · 2026Article
- Integrating Psychiatric Care With Gender-Affirming Primary Care to Meet Transgender, Non-Binary, and Gender Expansive Mental Health Needs: A Pilot Study.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Trans and nonbinary (TNB) people face ongoing and systematic oppression that negatively affects their mental health and well-being. However, past qualitative research highlights the unique ways in which TNB people are resilient and resist these oppressive systems. Most quantitative research on TNB resilience uses general measures of resilience that do not reflect the unique ways that TNB people specifically demonstrate resilience. Further, traditional conceptualizations of resilience define resilience as an individual trait rather than encompassing group- and systems-level factors. Methods: This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a novel measure of TNB resilience based on the multidimensional TNB resilience framework that posits four dimensions of resilience (i.e. individual, interpersonal, community, and societal). Measure items were developed and refined using a community-engaged approach to ensure the measure adequately captures experiences of TNB resilience. We tested the validity and reliability of the scale with a large, diverse sample of TNB adults ( Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure with the subscales representing individual resilience, interpersonal resilience, community and societal engagement, and community and societal disengagement. The full scale and subscales were reliable and demonstrated convergent, discriminant, criterion, and incremental validity. Invariance testing showed that the scale is valid across gender, race, and age cohorts. Discussion: This novel measure provides a unique way to assess resilience from a multi-dimensional perspective that is grounded in TNB people's lived experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.