ArticleLREC ... International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation2026
LitTx: A New Treatment Relation Extraction Dataset.
Article in LREC ... International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interest in biomedical relation extraction (RE) continues to persist even in the LLM era owing to RE being a prominent way to build knowledge graphs, which further ground LLM applications, especially in preventing hallucinations. Therapy-disease treatment relations from scientific literature are an important type in RE as they indicate emerging therapeutic hypotheses and off-label usages being explored in the community. An automatically extracted evolving knowledge-base of such relations will be of great utility to researchers because doing it manually is not viable with the exponential growth of biomedical articles. In this paper, toward this end, we introduce a new expert-annotated dataset
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.