Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42516984›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiomes2026

Synergistic interactions between biogenic organic matter and microbial dynamics during simulated senescent cyanobacterial blooms in freshwater mesocosms.

Noémie Dechaux, Nina Guérin, Najet Thiney, Karine Escoubeyrou, Charlotte Duval, Sarah Fiorini, Charles-Hubert Paulin, Tarik Meziane, Emma Rochelle-Newall, Cécile Bernard and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Noémie Dechaux *Sorbonne Université, UMR 7618 CNRS - INRAE - IRD - Univ Paris Cité - UPEC, Institut d'Écologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Paris, France.
Nina Guérin *Sorbonne Université, UMR 7618 CNRS - INRAE - IRD - Univ Paris Cité - UPEC, Institut d'Écologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Paris, France.
Najet ThineySorbonne Université, UMR 8067 CNRS, Muséum National d'histoire Naturelle-IRD, Univ Antilles, Laboratoire de biologie des organismes et des écosystèmes aquatiques (BOREA), Paris, France.
Karine EscoubeyrouSorbonne Université, FR 3724 CNRS, Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls, Banyuls-sur-Mer, France.
Charlotte DuvalMuséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7245 CNRS-MNHN, Molécules de Communication et Adaptation des Microorganismes (MCAM), Paris, France.
Sarah FioriniCentre de recherche en écologie expérimentale et prédictive (CEREEP-Ecotron Ile-de- France), Département de Biologie, École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, PSL University, Saint-Pierre-lès-Nemours, France.
Charles-Hubert PaulinSorbonne Université, FR 3724 CNRS, Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls, Banyuls-sur-Mer, France.
Tarik MezianeSorbonne Université, UMR 8067 CNRS, Muséum National d'histoire Naturelle-IRD, Univ Antilles, Laboratoire de biologie des organismes et des écosystèmes aquatiques (BOREA), Paris, France.
Emma Rochelle-NewallSorbonne Université, UMR 7618 CNRS - INRAE - IRD - Univ Paris Cité - UPEC, Institut d'Écologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Paris, France.
Cécile BernardMuséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7245 CNRS-MNHN, Molécules de Communication et Adaptation des Microorganismes (MCAM), Paris, France.
Julie LeloupSorbonne Université, UMR 7618 CNRS - INRAE - IRD - Univ Paris Cité - UPEC, Institut d'Écologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Paris, France.
Dominique LamySorbonne Université, UMR 7618 CNRS - INRAE - IRD - Univ Paris Cité - UPEC, Institut d'Écologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the major consequences of a phytoplanktonic bloom is the massive release of autochthonous organic matter (OM) into the water column, stimulating heterotrophic microbial activity and disrupting the trophic web. To better understand the consequences of such biotic stress, the senescent phase of a bloom was simulated under semi-controlled conditions through the addition of cyanobacterial-derived OM from

Indexed as

cyanobacterial bloomfree-livingfreshwatermesocosmsmicrobial communities compositionorganic matterparticle-attachedtemporal dynamic

Identifiers

PMID42516984
PMCPMC13402508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.