Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42516946›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026

The early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to colorectal cancer treatment in Brazil: a spatial and interrupted time-series analysis.

Luís Ricardo Santos de Melo, Júlio Dos Santos Pereira, Matheus Santos Melo, Carlos Dornels Freire de Souza, Caíque Jordan Nunes Ribeiro, Carlos Anselmo Lima, Allan Dantas Dos Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luís Ricardo Santos de MeloNursing Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, Brazil.
Júlio Dos Santos PereiraCenter for Research in Public Health, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, Brazil.
Matheus Santos MeloCenter for Research in Public Health, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, Brazil.
Carlos Dornels Freire de SouzaCenter for Research in Public Health, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, Brazil.
Caíque Jordan Nunes RibeiroNursing Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, Brazil.
Carlos Anselmo LimaHealth Sciences Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Aracaju, Brazil.
Allan Dantas Dos SantosNursing Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused unprecedented disruptions in cancer care globally, disproportionately affecting access in low- and middle-income countries. In Brazil, data on how specific treatment modalities and delays have evolved during the pandemic remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment in Brazil, focusing on regional disparities in the time from diagnosis to treatment initiation across therapeutic modalities. Methods: We conducted a nationwide, population-based study using data from the Oncology Panel of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Therapeutic modalities included surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combined chemoradiotherapy, categorized by treatment initiation intervals: within 30 days, 31-60 days, and over 60 days. The age-standardized treatment access rate (ASTAR) were defined as the rate of patients initiating treatment within each interval. Spatial analyses were performed to examine regional disparities across Health Regions using ASTAR percentage change. For temporal evaluation, we applied an interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis using monthly ASTAR and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment access rate (ITAR), defining the pre-pandemic period as January 2018-March 2020 and the post-pandemic period as beginning in April 2020. ITAR was estimated by comparing observed and expected delay rates in 2020. Findings: A total of 118,720 CRC treatment records were analyzed, of which 50.44% were male and 49.56% female. The most pronounced disruptions occurred in the Health Regions in the North, Northeast, and Midwest. ITS analysis revealed a significant level decrease by April 2020 for early access to all the treatments combined (-0.035; 95% CI: -0.091 to -0.022), chemotherapy (-0.040; 95% CI: (-0.096 to 0.018) and surgery (-0.040; 95% CI: (-0.096 to 0.018), while radiotherapy (0.002; 95% CI: 0.000-0.004) showed no meaningful level change. In 2020, a marked decline in access to early treatment was observed: surgery, chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy initiated within 30 days decreased by 18% compared with the expected levels (0.82; 95% CI: 0.68-0.96). Conversely, the rate of radiotherapy within 30 days increased by 43% (ITAR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.27-1.58). Overall, access rates remained below pre-pandemic trends until 2022. Interpretation: The COVID-19 pandemic substantially disrupted access to colorectal cancer treatment in Brazil, particularly for timely surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions. Regional inequalities were exacerbated, disproportionately affecting underserved areas with historical structural limitations. Although partial recovery occurred with some modalities, treatment rates remained below expected levels through 2022. These findings highlight the vulnerability of oncology care pathways during public health crises and underscore the need for resilient, regionally coordinated strategies to protect timely cancer treatment in future emergencies. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerCOVID-19Health disparitiesInterrupted time seriesTreatment access

Identifiers

PMID42516946
PMCPMC13404213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.