ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Recurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissection, diagnostic issues, and management: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a severe and under-diagnosed pathology that generates diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Case summary: This case is about a 45-year-old female with a history of coronary spasm in 2012 without ergonovine provocation confirmation. She was admitted in 2014 for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) revealing an aspect of thrombus of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. GPIIb/IIIa antagonists, unfractionated heparin, and antiplatelet therapy were introduced. Angiographic control 10 days later showed that the lesion was not thrombotic but a SCAD which spread on the left main coronary artery and LAD proximal part. Angiographic control at 1 month showed a partial healing but persistent focal dissection of the mid-LAD treated by two bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. In 2018, she presented with a new case of SCAD treated at another hospital, where she had been misdiagnosed with myocarditis. A review of the angiograms revealed findings typical of distal SCAD of the circumflex artery. In June 2022, a new ACS was related to a right coronary artery SCAD. The distal part was occluded by an extensive haematoma. This was turned into a dissection by using a cutting balloon. No stent was implanted. Discussion: SCAD is a complex condition that presents diagnostic challenges, as this case illustrates. Such diagnostic errors can lead to the prescription of inappropriate medication, such as anticoagulant therapy, which may exacerbate the condition by increasing the size of the haematoma. It is also a condition that can recur, and clinicians must bear this in mind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.