Trial reportPeerJ2026
Effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on EEG and sEMG signals after low-load exercise.
Trial report in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on acute exercise-induced fatigue via electroencephalogram (EEG) signal and surface electromyography (sEMG) signal, with the aim of providing a theoretical basis and methodological reference for promoting fatigue recovery. We hypothesized that HBOT for 60 min and natural recovery would reverse the changes in the indicators related to blood flow restriction (BFR) intervention, with HBOT demonstrating a superior restorative effect. Methods: College students ( Results: LA, RPE, alpha and theta waves in the central area and occipital lobe; alpha waves in the parietal lobe; and average values of RMS, MF, and MPF of the musculus femoris medialis, musculus rectus femoris, and external sural muscle had time-group interaction effects. After intervention, the experimental group exhibited significantly higher α wave amplitudes (central, occipital, and parietal lobes) and MF and MPF values (vastus medialis, rectus femoris, and lateral gastrocnemius), compared with the control group ( Conclusion: EEG and sEMG signal measurements indicate that BFR intervention induces central and peripheral fatigue simultaneously. After fatigue, 1.3 ATA-HBOT accelerates recovery from both types of fatigue within 60 min. Thus, this recovery method can be used as an effective strategy to accelerate recovery from BFR intervention-induced fatigue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.