Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42516920›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026

Exploring the benefits, facilitators and barriers to male involvement in sexual and reproductive health: a qualitative study of nurses' and midwives' perspectives in Ghana.

Evelyn Asamoah Ampofo, Caroline Dinam Badzi, Berit Mortensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evelyn Asamoah AmpofoSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Caroline Dinam BadziSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Berit MortensenFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet - Storbyuniversitetet, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Male involvement in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) though a relatively old concept in Ghana continues to evolve traditionally focusing on women's health. The World Health Organization has encouraged gender-inclusive maternal health services to leverage men's roles in supporting their partners' health. Aim: This study aims to explore the perspectives of nurses and midwives on male involvement in SRH, identifying benefits, challenges, and strategies for enhancement. Method: A qualitative exploratory design was employed in Greater Accra Region, Ghana, engaging 32 nurses and midwives through five focus group discussions. Data collection involved using a semi-structured interview guide and recorded interviews. Data analysis was based on Braun and Clark's thematic analysis framework. Results: Findings revealed three primary themes: benefits of male involvement, barriers to participation, and strategies to enhance engagement. Participants noted significant positive outcomes, including improved health outcomes for women, reduced complications due to emotional and logistical support by male partners. However, barriers such as cultural norms, societal expectations and inadequate knowledge hindered active male involvement. This notwithstanding, participants have a strong desire to promote male involvement. Discussion: Results underscore the necessity of comprehensive education and community engagement to reshape attitudes towards male involvement. The lack of formal training for healthcare providers on facilitating male participation was identified as a critical gap. Conclusion: Enhancing male involvement in SRH can significantly improve maternal health outcomes. Nurses and midwives play a pivotal role in promoting this initiative through targeted education, outreach programs, and policy advocacy, ultimately fostering healthier family dynamics in Ghanaian society.

Indexed as

benefitsfacilitatorsGhanamale involvementmidwives & nursesreproductive healthsexual and reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID42516920
PMCPMC13402484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.