Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42516904›Full record

ReviewERJ open research2026

Biochemistry-based machine learning algorithms in differentiating pleural effusion: current status and perspective.

Wen-Jie Hou, Xu-Lei Hao, Ran-Tong Bao, Li Yan, José M Porcel, Wen-Qi Zheng, Ya-Nan Xu, Zhi-De Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wen-Jie HouCenter for Clinical Epidemiology Research, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Xu-Lei HaoCenter for Clinical Epidemiology Research, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Ran-Tong BaoCenter for Clinical Epidemiology Research, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Li YanKey Laboratory for Biomarkers, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
José M PorcelPleural Medicine and Clinical Ultrasound Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2734-8061
Wen-Qi ZhengKey Laboratory for Biomarkers, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Ya-Nan XuCenter for Clinical Epidemiology Research, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Zhi-De HuCenter for Clinical Epidemiology Research, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3679-4992

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differential diagnosis of pleural effusion remains challenging. Microbiological and cytopathological examinations are considered the gold standards; however, they are limited by their low sensitivity, subjectivity, invasiveness and prolonged turnaround times. Pleural fluid and serum biochemical tests offer the advantages of objectivity, short turnaround time, minimal invasiveness and easy accessibility, which can help pulmonologists estimate the risk of the target disease. However, their effectiveness is often suboptimal when they are used alone. Recent advances suggest that machine learning (ML) algorithms can enhance diagnostic accuracy when combined with multiple parameters. Several studies have applied ML approaches based on biochemical tests to diagnose pleural effusion, with preliminary results indicating an improved diagnostic performance. This article reviews the application of such algorithms in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion, highlights their current limitations and provides recommendations for future research.

Identifiers

PMID42516904
PMCPMC13402967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.