ArticleHealth promotion perspectives2026
Exploring Australian Health Promotion Practitioners' Awareness, Understanding and Application of Theories of the Policy Process in Health Promotion Practice: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Health promotion perspectives, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Theories of the policy process provide structured ways to understand, navigate and influence political landscapes using evidence-based approaches. While influencing policy is a core function of the health promotion discipline, little is known about how practitioners engage with these theories. This study aims to address this gap by examining health promotion practitioners' awareness, understanding, and application of theories of the policy process in practice, and factors influencing health promotion practitioners' engagement in policy processes. Methods: A thematic qualitative study was used to explore perspectives and experiences of health promotion practitioners practicing in Queensland, Australia using online, semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed with NVivo software using a reflexive thematic analysis to identify key themes. Results: Four key themes were generated; 1) health promotion practitioners understand policy process complexity but have limited awareness of theories of the policy process, 2) health promotion practitioners implicitly apply constructs of theories of the policy process in their practice, 3) organisational context shapes the extent to which health promotion practitioners' are positioned to engage in policy processes, and 4) industry-level factors influence health promotion practitioners' engagement in policy processes. Conclusion: Opportunities exist for health promotion practitioners to more explicitly draw from theories of the policy process to inform their practice in influencing healthy public policy for population health and equity outcomes. Stronger inclusion of theories of the policy process within tertiary education and professional development, including formalising industry accreditation, may support strengthening and maintaining practitioner skills to meet industry core competencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.