ReviewHealth promotion perspectives2026
Toward a Unified Understanding: A Literature Review of Self-Care Conceptualization for the General Population.
Review in Health promotion perspectives, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The study and conceptualization of self-care have a longstanding history. However, a clear conceptualization of self-care remains contested due to the plurality of perspectives and diversity of definitions, particularly when considering the general population regardless of pathology. Our literature review aimed to better understand how to conceptualize self-care for the general population, drawing on existing scientific literature on self-care theory and conceptualization. Methods: We followed The Cochrane Collaboration's and PRISMA-P Group's methodological guidelines for the conceptualization, analysis, and reporting of literature reviews. Results: Our results reaffirmed the varied and evolving interpretations of self-care and provided insights into conceptualizing and promoting self-care among the general population. The analysis, based on three main criteria (definitions, antecedents, and consequences), highlighted a continuous renewal of the self-care concept across various disciplines and demographic groups. For the general population, self-care is fundamentally intentional and purpose-driven, encompassing a wide spectrum of purposes from health management to enhancing overall well-being. This multifaceted concept integrates actions, abilities, and socio-cognitive processes and emphasizes the importance of understanding the multiple antecedents of self-care to develop effective policies and interventions that enhance well-being and quality of life across diverse groups. Conclusion: From our perspective, the conceptualization of self-care for the general population benefits from a systemic, ecological view. Moreover, promoting self-care outcomes, such as autonomy, independence, and self-efficacy, can yield benefits, including improved health and well-being for the general population. We advocate for a multi-tiered approach to self-care promotion, implemented through schools, workplaces, and broader community contexts, to maximize benefits across society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.