ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2026
Clinical and functional outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation for scapular fractures using the modified Judet approach.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDisplaced scapular fractures are uncommon injuries, and the optimal surgical approach remains controversial. Muscle-preserving techniques may improve post-operative shoulder function by minimizing soft-tissue damage. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a muscle-preserving modified Judet approach in displaced scapular fractures and to assess the effect of surgical timing on post-operative shoulder function.
methodsThis retrospective study included 12 adult patients who underwent ORIF for displaced scapular fractures between 2015 and 2024 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Fractures were classified according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association system and treated using the modified Judet approach. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Constant-Murley, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores, and shoulder range of motion was compared with the contralateral side.
resultsMean patient age was 35.3±15.0 years, and mean follow-up was 41.6±37.5 months. Fracture union was achieved in all patients at a mean of 7.5±1.7 weeks. No infections, neurovascular injuries, malunion, or infraspinatus atrophy occurred. Final shoulder motion reached 97% forward flexion, 89% abduction, 93% external rotation, and 90.9% internal rotation compared with the contralateral side. Mean constant, DASH, and UCLA scores were 84.0±8.6, 6.1±8.8, and 31.9±3.4, respectively. All patients returned to work at a mean of 4.7±2.3 months.
conclusionORIF using a muscle-preserving modified Judet approach provides reliable union, low complication rates, and satisfactory functional recovery in displaced scapular fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.