ArticleFrontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry2026
Ethno-evolutionary insights and missed critical periods hypothesis of Autism Spectrum Condition.
Article in Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article proposes an ethno-evolutionary "missed critical periods" hypothesis of Autism Spectrum Condition (ASC), integrating developmental neuroscience with anthropological and ethological perspectives. Drawing on evidence that the first year of life is characterized by heightened brain plasticity and rapidly narrowing sensory-social attunement, the manuscript argues that core ASC symptoms reflect the downstream outcome of early hyper-focalized attentional styles interacting with historically situated caregiving ecologies, rather than a fixed, context-independent defect. Early prospective studies of high-likelihood infants show that subtle alterations in gaze, socio-communicative reciprocity and restricted, repetitive behaviors emerge within the first months, opening a window for pre-emptive, parent-mediated intervention. Converging data from pre-emptive interventions suggest that targeting infant-caregiver micro-interactions during this window can substantially modify developmental trajectories and, in some cases, reduce or mitigate disability. Placing these findings in an evolutionary frame, the article hypothesizes that genetic liabilities for ASC have long been present across human groups, but that dense, multi-caregiver, high-contact rearing practices typical of hunter-gatherer societies may have buffered against the manifestation of disabling phenotypes. The authors highlight implications for contemporary Western child-rearing norms and outline future research directions, including randomized pre-emptive trials with neurophysiological outcomes and cross-cultural studies in traditional societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.