Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42516723›Full record

ArticleBMJ medicine2026

Completion and outcomes of postmarketing requirements and commitments issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for new drugs, 2016-24: cross sectional evaluation of postmarketing studies.

Maximilian Siebert, Rylee McGonigle, Alba Gutiérrez-Sacristán, Huseyin Naci, Anita K Wagner, Florence T Bourgeois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maximilian SiebertHarvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4385-5773
Rylee McGonigleHarvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Alba Gutiérrez-SacristánDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1245-198X
Huseyin NaciDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-5751
Anita K WagnerDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-6668
Florence T BourgeoisHarvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the use of postmarketing requirements under the FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA) and postmarketing commitments issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for new drugs approved from 2016 to 2024, and to determine rates of study completion and changes in drug labelling resulting from these studies. Design: Cross sectional evaluation of postmarketing studies. Setting: All new drugs and their associated indications approved by the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2024. Population: 420 drugs approved by the FDA for 567 indications, associated with 913 FDAAA postmarketing requirements and 434 postmarketing commitments. Main outcome measures: Drug characteristics associated with issuance of FDAAA postmarketing requirements and issuance of postmarketing commitments, rates of study completion and on-time completion, and proportion of studies leading to changes in drug labelling. Results: More than two thirds of drugs (n=287, 68.3%) had at least one FDAAA postmarketing requirement and 42.9% (n=180) had at least one postmarketing commitment. Indications with an orphan designation were more likely to have an FDAAA postmarketing requirement (63.3% Conclusions: FDAAA postmarketing requirements and postmarketing commitments are important regulatory tools for generating postapproval evidence, particularly for drugs approved with orphan designation or under expedited programmes. Although a large proportion of studies resulted in changes in drug labelling, delays in completion were common, highlighting the need to ensure effective oversight and timely study completion and reporting.

Indexed as

Clinical trialTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID42516723
PMCPMC13405232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.