ReviewJournal of rheumatic diseases2026
Evolving landscape of imaging-based evaluation in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated interstitial lung disease: from visual assessment to quantitative artificial intelligence-assisted evaluation.
Review in Journal of rheumatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a major driver of morbidity and mortality across systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), with systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) providing the most extensive evidence base. In this context, progressive pulmonary fibrosis has emerged as a central framework, as it is associated with increased mortality and facilitates the identification of candidates for antifibrotic therapy. Nevertheless, operational thresholds for chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)-defined progression remain ill defined: current guidelines rely on visual HRCT interpretation and lack standardized, reproducible assessment protocols. Because the magnitude and topography of disease evolution can guide therapeutic decisions, quantitative evaluation of imaging features is pivotal. In this review, we delineate the evolution of imaging assessment from qualitative reads to quantitative phenotyping. We organize traditional densitometric and textural metrics (e.g., percentage high-attenuation areas, quantitative lung fibrosis, CALIPER [Computer-Aided Lung Informatics for Pathology Evaluation and Ratings]) alongside hybrid/data-driven approaches (e.g., data-driven textural analysis, quantitative interstitial abnormality) and recent deep-learning tools (e.g., SOFIA [Systemic Objective Fibrotic Imaging Analysis Algorithm], eLung, Qureight, SATORI [Segmentation and Annotation Tool for Radiomics and Deep Learning], AirQuant). Given the rapid pace of innovation in artificial-intelligence-based quantitative CT, we present a curated set of analytic approaches and offer a concise framework for understanding technological progress and evaluating its relevance to SARD-ILD applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.