ArticleBMJ public health2026
Magnitude and the underlying reasons for routine prophylactic antibiotic use after uncomplicated vaginal births: A mixed-methods study in Eastern Uganda.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Routine prophylactic antibiotic use is not recommended following uncomplicated vaginal births because of the global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The study was conducted to determine the magnitude and underlying reasons for routine antibiotic use following uncomplicated vaginal births. Methods: We conducted an explanatory sequential study among women with uncomplicated vaginal births. We interviewed 370 women following facility discharge using interviewer-administered questionnaires. Eight in-depth interviews were conducted among midwives and clinical officers. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyse the data. The study obtained ethical clearance. Results: The median age of the participants was 25 (interquartile range 20-30). Out of the 370 women, 34% (n=127/370) had perineal tears, 19% (n=69/370) had preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and 6% (n=23/370) had preterm labour. Almost all (99%) women with uncomplicated vaginal births were prescribed prophylactic antibiotics during facility discharge. A combination of amoxicillin and metronidazole (49%, n=181/366) and ampiclox and metronidazole (40%, n=147/366) were the commonly prescribed drugs during discharge. Antibiotics were routinely given to prevent puerperal infections. Perineal tears, episiotomies and unsterile environment were additional justification given for antibiotic use. Sterility was seen to be untenable which necessitated antibiotic use to cover for gaps in maintaining infection prevention and control measures. In some cases, antibiotics were considered necessary regardless of the absence of medical indications and the risk of AMR. Healthcare providers had inadequate awareness of the risks of AMR and the guidelines on antibiotic use during discharge. Conclusions: Widespread routine antibiotic use after uncomplicated vaginal births reflected practices of overmedicalisation of childbirth and limited awareness of AMR. Developing local policies, strengthening infection prevention and control measures and innovating antimicrobial stewardship initiatives may be critical in reducing unnecessary antibiotic use after delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.